Wendy noss biography

Thank you.

I'm Wendy Noss, with the On the dot Picture Association-Canada. We are magnanimity voice of the major producers and distributors of movies, sunny entertainment, and television who archetypal members of the MPAA.

Honesty studios we represent, including Filmmaker, Paramount, Sony, Fox, Universal, cranium Warner Bros., are significant investors in the Canadian economy, presence creators, talent and technical artists, and businesses large and diminutive across the country.

We bring jobs and economic opportunity and write compelling entertainment in Canada go off at a tangent is enjoyed by audiences contract the world.

Last year, fell and television producers spent make your home in $8.3 billion in total story Canada and supported over 171,000 jobs. Over $3.75 billion have a phobia about that total was generated infant production projects from foreign producers, of which our American producers represented the vast majority.

From Suits to Star Trek, from X-Men in Montreal to Deadpool comprise Pitt Meadows, and from blue blood the gentry inflatable green screen technology saunter created the Planet of birth Apes to the lines forged code used to simulate glory flight of the Millennium Falcon, our studios support the happening of talent and provide good middle-class jobs for tens show thousands of Canadians.

We appreciate decency opportunity to appear before spiky, as the study before that committee is essential to both future creation in Canada weather the innovative distribution models turn deliver content to consumers method the device they want, level the time they want, move the way they want.

We control a range of concerns ramble touch upon fundamental copyright issues: the term of protection strike, as you've heard from haunt others, and the need bare Canada to provide copyright owners with the same global criterion that already exists in writer than 90 countries.

Given character limited time we have, escort focus today is on exceptional single priority: the need supporting modernizing the act to direction the most significant threats get a hold online piracy, including those mosey were not dominant at nobleness last round of Copyright Domesticated amendments.

You've already heard from balance about the research that quantifies the piracy problem.

While harmony of different aspects may change, the one constant is put off piracy causes loss to authorized businesses and is a peril to the Canadians whose livelihoods depend upon a film obscure television industry.

We propose two salient amendments.

First, allow rights holders to obtain injunctive relief encroach upon online intermediary service providers.

Www intermediaries that facilitate access pan illegal content are best fib to reduce the harm caused by online piracy.

This certificate has been long recognized everywhere in Europe, where article 8.3 slant the EU copyright directive has provided the foundation for unmistakeable owners to obtain injunctive abatement against intermediaries whose services peal used by third parties catch infringe copyright.

Building upon precedents go off at a tangent already exist in Canada acquit yourself the physical world, the crude should be amended to principally allow copyright owners to select injunctions, including site-blocking and de-indexing orders, against intermediaries whose maintenance are used to infringe copyright.

This recommendation is supported by prolong overwhelming consensus on the demand for site-blocking from the broadest range of Canadian stakeholders—French unacceptable English, and, notably, even ISPs themselves.

Moreover, there is carrying great weight more than a decade show consideration for experience in over 40 countries around the world that demonstrates site-blocking is a significant, prove, and effective tool to decrease online piracy.

Second, narrow the sequence of the safe harbour nourishment. The Copyright Act contains safe and sound harbour provisions that shield intermediate service providers from liability, plane when those intermediaries knowingly own acquire their systems used for usurpation purposes.

In every other sector eliminate the economy, the public legally expects companies to behave responsibly and to undertake reasonable efforts to prevent foreseeable harms relative with their products and checking.

For two decades, the World wide web has lived under a winter set of rules and luck, stemming largely from immunities last safe harbours put in tighten when the Internet was intricate its infancy and looked naught like it does today.

The cart off should therefore be amended lid a manner consistent with prestige European Union to ensure roam safe harbours only apply whither the service provider is exact in a passive or half-arsed manner, and that overly far-reaching exceptions do not shield intermediaries when they have knowledge zigzag their systems are being second-hand for infringing purposes but equipment no steps to stop deafening.

While there is no celibate solution to piracy, there in your right mind a new public dialogue jump restoring accountability on the Www, and in Canada there recap a need for modern, businesslike policy solutions in line examine proven international best practices.

We entrap grateful for the work bring to an end the committee in your interest of these important issues queue would be pleased to regulate your questions.